Pradhan Mantri Aadi Adarsh Gram Yojana (PMAAGY): Inclusive Development of Tribal Villages in Nagaland

---

---

Project Details

Category: Tribal Development
Project Title: Pradhan Mantri Aadi Adarsh Gram Yojana (PMAAGY): Inclusive Development of Tribal Villages in Nagaland
Department or District: Department of Tribal Affairs
State: Nagaland
Start Date of the Project: The project commenced in 2021 and is scheduled to continue through 2025.
Website: https://tribalaffairs.nagaland.gov.in/

---

Tribe(s) that the Project Covers: The project focuses on the Scheduled Tribe (ST) population residing in the tribal-majority villages across Nagaland.

Keywords: Pradhan Mantri Aadi Adarsh Gram Yojana, PMAAGY, Tribal Development, Community Participation, Inclusive Development, Agri-Link Roads, SHGs, Gender Inclusion, Infrastructure Development, Tribal Empowerment, Participatory Planning, Rural Transformation

The Pradhan Mantri Aadi Adarsh Gram Yojana (PMAAGY) is a national-level initiative aimed at transforming tribal-majority villages into model villages, termed Adarsh Grams, through inclusive and participatory development. The project in Nagaland was spearheaded by the Department of Tribal Affairs and focused on uplifting the socio-economic and infrastructural conditions of tribal communities across the state.

The Project

Under PMAAGY, 530 tribal villages were strategically selected for development interventions. The selection was based on the concentration of Scheduled Tribe populations to ensure targeted benefits. The development model was centered around the creation of Village Development Plans (VDPs) that were specifically tailored for each village based on the identified developmental gaps. These VDPs were formulated with active community participation and were approved through a structured governance system involving Village Councils, Gram Sabhas, District Planning and Monitoring Committees, and a State-level Working Committee.

Problems that it Intends to Solve

The primary issues that the project aimed to address included the lack of basic infrastructure such as schools, health centers, sanitation facilities, drinking water supply, livelihood opportunities, and market access. Remote locations, difficult terrains, poor road connectivity, and limited digital access further compounded the developmental challenges faced by these tribal villages. The project sought to bridge these gaps to ensure sustainable development and upliftment of tribal communities.

What was the Need

Given the persistent developmental disparities in tribal areas, there was a pressing need for a comprehensive, community-driven, and culturally sensitive development strategy. The unique socio-economic conditions of Nagaland’s tribal villages necessitated an approach that emphasized inclusivity, local ownership, and sensitivity to the local terrain and cultural practices. Without such focused efforts, the risk of continued marginalization and lack of basic services in these villages remained high.

What Hindered its Introduction

The initial hindrances to introducing the project included limited awareness among the tribal communities, the geographical isolation of villages, and the logistical challenges posed by Nagaland’s hilly topography. Moreover, the diverse governance systems and cultural norms across different tribes required careful navigation to ensure that the project was both acceptable and effective at the grassroots level.

Implementation Process

• Government
  • The Department of Tribal Affairs, Government of Nagaland, led the project with 100% Grant-in-Aid funding from the Government of India, amounting to Rs. 20.38 lakhs per village as a “Gap-Filling Fund.” The state government initiated statewide sensitization drives across all districts to engage stakeholders and raise awareness about the project objectives and processes. Approval mechanisms were established through multi-tiered governance involving Village Councils, Gram Sabhas, District Committees, and the State Working Committee.
• Involvement of Community
  • The project followed a bottom-up planning approach wherein the local communities played a central role in identifying their own developmental gaps. Village Development Plans were prepared by the villagers themselves and were required to be approved by the Village Councils or Gram Sabhas. The active participation of local governance bodies such as Village Councils and Village Development Boards (VDBs) was integral to planning, monitoring, and ensuring accountability.

Solutions Implemented

The solutions included the construction and improvement of basic infrastructure such as agri-link roads, health centers, educational facilities, water reservoirs, drainage systems, retaining walls, and marketing sheds. The project also emphasized the promotion of livelihoods through the support of piggery, poultry, and Self-Help Groups (SHGs). Special attention was given to gender inclusion by supporting women’s participation through SHGs and establishing marketing infrastructure to facilitate sales by tribal women.

Details of the Coverage

The project covered 530 villages across Nagaland, benefiting the entire Scheduled Tribe population in these areas. The villages were selected based on demographic and developmental indicators to ensure focused interventions. The implementation was conducted in a district-wise phased manner, which allowed for adaptive learning and progressive scaling across the state.

Innovation and Unique Features

• New Approaches: Tech Integration, Capacity Building, and Cultural Sensitivity
  • Although digital connectivity was limited, the project incorporated geo-tagging, manual audits, and extensive field visits to monitor progress. The approach emphasized capacity building at the village level through sensitization drives and participatory planning. The infrastructure and development models were customized to suit Nagaland’s unique terrain and cultural contexts.
  • The integration of local governance structures, tribal knowledge in product design, and the direct involvement of SHG women in business decision-making represents a powerful co-creation model. Capacity-building workshops have improved managerial, financial, and branding competencies.
• Co-Creation: Role of Tribal Knowledge and Leadership
  • The project was distinctly community-led, with tribal leadership playing a pivotal role in the identification of needs, the formulation of plans, and the monitoring of implementation. This co-creation approach ensured that the interventions were aligned with the local aspirations and governance traditions.
• Adaptations During Implementation
  • Several adaptations were made to overcome challenges such as seasonal monsoon disruptions, difficult terrain, and low digital penetration. Solutions included flexible construction schedules, manual monitoring systems, and culturally sensitive engagement strategies to align with the diverse tribal governance frameworks.
  • During its rollout, PALASH transitioned from a rural marketing idea to a holistic enterprise ecosystem. Challenges such as inventory management and financial literacy led to the creation of an MIS system and targeted training programs for grassroots teams.

Challenges Faced Before Implementation

• Internal Challenges
  • Internal challenges included limited prior exposure of local institutions to structured development planning and the need to coordinate across multiple administrative layers for approvals and monitoring.
• External Challenges
  • Externally, the remote locations, difficult hilly terrain, and low initial community awareness posed significant hurdles. There was also a need to address cultural sensitivities and diverse tribal systems across the state.
• Mitigation Efforts
  • To overcome these barriers, the government conducted intensive sensitization campaigns and local engagements before the project rollout. The project encouraged local contributions and the use of locally available resources, which facilitated smoother community buy-in and implementation.

Challenges Faced During Implementation

• Internal Challenges
  • During implementation, limited institutional capacity at the grassroots level sometimes slowed the process. Coordinating timely approvals at multiple governance levels also required persistent efforts.
• External Challenges
  • The project faced transportation delays and construction difficulties due to the tough terrain and seasonal monsoons. Limited digital infrastructure also posed challenges for real-time tracking and data collection.
• Mitigation Efforts
  • These issues were mitigated through manual audits, regular field visits, flexible scheduling to accommodate weather patterns, and the use of geo-tagging for project sites. Community-led monitoring further ensured transparency and timely problem-solving.

Outcomes

• Quantitative
  • The project resulted in the construction and improvement of essential infrastructure in 530 villages. Key achievements included improved agricultural access through agri-link roads, enhanced health services with extended health centers, better educational facilities with new staff quarters and school renovations, secured drinking water through water reservoirs, and reinforced disaster resilience with retaining walls and drainage systems.
  • The direct beneficiaries were the entire Scheduled Tribe populations of the 530 villages, with specific benefits accruing to farmers, students, women’s groups, and healthcare recipients. The inclusive model ensured that the project positively impacted all segments of the community.
• Qualitative
  • Qualitatively, the project achieved greater community ownership, improved livelihoods, increased women’s participation in economic activities, and stronger social cohesion. The creation of marketing sheds empowered tribal women by providing direct market access for local produce. Enhanced local governance capacities and community participation were key intangible outcomes.
• Monitoring and Evaluation
  • Monitoring was conducted through field inspections, manual audits, and geo-tagging despite limited digital infrastructure. The active involvement of Village Councils and VDBs in the planning and monitoring stages added a layer of community accountability and ensured reliability.

Replicability / Scalability / Sustainability

• Policy Integration
  • The success of the project enabled its integration into the DA-JGUA Scheme from 2024 onwards through a convergence approach with other line departments, ensuring continued support and alignment with broader development policies.
• Financial Sustainability
  • The project’s participatory planning and community contribution approach promoted financial sustainability by encouraging local resource utilization and reducing dependency on external funding for maintenance.
• Replication
  • Given its proven effectiveness, adaptability, and cultural sensitivity, the PMAAGY model implemented in Nagaland is replicable in other hilly or tribal regions of India, with appropriate localization to address specific community needs and geographical conditions.

Presentation

Video

Gallery

---