Sarvodaya in Action: Residential Schooling as a Social Equalizer in Uttar Pradesh

---

---

Project Details

Category: Forest Produce
Project Title: Jai Prakash Narayan Sarvodaya Vidyalayas (JPN SV)
Department or District: Social Welfare Department
State: Uttar Pradesh
Start Date of the Project: 2010
Website: https://samajkalyan.up.gov.in/

---

Tribe(s) that the Project Covers: The project serves students from Scheduled Castes, Other Backward Classes, and the General category, particularly from economically weaker backgrounds across all districts of Uttar Pradesh.

Keywords: Social Inclusion, SC, ST, OBC, STEM, Coaching

The Jai Prakash Narayan Sarvodaya Vidyalayas (JPN SVs) initiative is an ambitious residential school model launched by the Social Welfare Department of Uttar Pradesh. Aimed at bridging educational gaps and enabling inclusive growth, these schools provide free, high-quality education to socio-economically disadvantaged students in a structured and nurturing environment. With infrastructure akin to premier institutions and a robust focus on STEM, personality development, and competitive exam preparation, JPN SVs are emerging as a replicable model of social transformation.

The Project

Started in 2010, the project has established 94 Sarvodaya Vidyalayas across the state, with a total student strength of over 35,000. Among these, 45 schools are affiliated with the CBSE board and 49 with the Uttar Pradesh board. The institutions are segregated by gender, with 65 for boys and 29 for girls. Admissions are conducted through entrance examinations for Classes 6 to 9, and on merit in Class 11 based on board exam results. Seats are reserved for SC (60%), OBC (25%), and General (15%) categories, making it a powerful vehicle for affirmative action in education. The schools provide comprehensive free services, including education, hostel facilities, uniforms, learning materials, meals, and basic necessities.

Problems that it Intends to Solve

The project addresses multiple layers of disadvantage faced by students from backward social groups. These include poor access to quality schooling, lack of educational infrastructure in rural areas, absence of career counseling or coaching facilities, and social stigma associated with lower caste identities. Most students lacked access to residential education, experienced high dropout rates, and were excluded from advanced learning platforms and competitive exam preparation. The system also sought to break gender-based barriers by establishing exclusive institutions for girls.

What was the Need

There was an urgent need to uplift the educational standards of students from marginalized backgrounds who were systematically excluded from mainstream opportunities. With economic barriers and geographic remoteness limiting access, the state needed a mechanism to centralize quality education while ensuring socio-cultural inclusiveness. Residential schooling was a strategic choice, ensuring round-the-clock academic, nutritional, and emotional support. Additionally, there was a policy imperative to supplement central schemes like RMSA and RTE with state-specific interventions that cater to local demographics.

What Hindered its Introduction

Initial obstacles to the implementation included administrative inertia, challenges in large-scale infrastructure creation, and staffing difficulties for remote residential locations. At the societal level, parental reluctance, especially in sending girls to residential schools, posed a significant barrier. There was also resistance from local power structures uncomfortable with the social mobility such an initiative could trigger. Financial allocations were constrained, and coordination among education, social welfare, and public works departments needed streamlining.

Process Followed for Implementation

• Government
  • The Social Welfare Department led the project with the support of district-level administration. Educational boards provided curriculum and assessment oversight. NIC and other technology partners supported the digitization of various components, such as student tracking and coaching platforms.
• Involvement of NGO
  • Multiple NGOs, such as Khan Academy and LEAPForward, have supported capacity building and digital learning content delivery. Institutions like Indian Child Protection Fund (ICPF) and Surmay Life Foundation played critical roles in providing mental health and grooming modules, respectively.
• Involvement of Community
  • Community mobilization was conducted through awareness drives, especially during the admission season. Local influencers and community leaders encouraged parents to enroll their children. Parent-teacher associations and alumni networks have gradually developed to support continued engagement.

Solutions Implemented

JPN SVs implemented a residential schooling model with uniform infrastructure, curriculum, and service delivery. Innovations included digital math classes via Khan Academy, cyber safety training through ICPF, and STEM education using Ignite My Future and Go-IT modules under CSR collaborations. Specialized training in aeromodelling and artificial intelligence was conducted in partnership with IHFC and COGRAD. Students receive English literacy instruction through the LEAPForward program, and NEET/JEE coaching is organized under the Abhyudaya scheme with support from Ex-Navodaya Foundation. State-of-the-art facilities like computer labs, science labs, libraries, and recreational rooms are standardized across all schools.

Details of the Coverage

The project is implemented across all districts of Uttar Pradesh, covering a total of 94 residential schools with 35,089 enrolled students. The coverage spans rural, semi-urban, and tribal belts, ensuring equitable access to secondary and senior secondary education for SC, OBC, and economically disadvantaged General Category students.

Innovation and Unique Features

• The project integrates residential schooling with competitive exam coaching, life skills training, and mental health support, making it a comprehensive educational model. It introduces emerging technology subjects like AI and STEM in government-run schools—a rarity. Cyber safety training for teachers and students and partnerships with global and national foundations for resource creation add to its distinctiveness.
• Tech integration, capacity building, culturally sensitive methods: The use of tablets, digital classrooms, and online learning portals strengthens the technological capacity of both teachers and students. Regular capacity-building workshops are conducted for faculty on new subjects, digital pedagogy, and student counseling. Cultural sensitivity is addressed through inclusive content, gender-segregated facilities, and context-aware modules on good and bad touch, diversity, and dignity of labor.
• Co-creation: While the project doesn’t directly integrate tribal knowledge systems, it benefits tribal students and communities by offering a mainstream platform for inclusion. Community elders and local educators contribute to outreach, especially in tribal and backward regions where parental skepticism towards residential schooling is high.
• How the project evolved: Initially, the schools were conventional in design and delivery. Over time, the program evolved to include digital content partnerships, mental health frameworks, and competitive exam readiness. Centralized student performance monitoring and real-time feedback loops have been instituted to fine-tune pedagogy and delivery.

Challenges Faced Before Implementation

• Internal Challenges
  • Recruitment of qualified teachers willing to work in residential setups was difficult. Curriculum alignment across CBSE and UP Board schools posed issues. Initial lack of standardized infrastructure created disparities.
• External Challenges
  • Convincing families, particularly in conservative or tribal belts, to send children—especially girls—to residential schools was a key barrier. Budget limitations and delays in interdepartmental coordination affected timely rollouts.
• Mitigation Efforts
  • Staff incentives, digital recruitment platforms, and alignment with education departments helped resolve internal issues. Extensive community engagement, awareness campaigns, and transport provisions supported external challenge mitigation.

Challenges Faced During Implementation

• Internal Challenges
  • Ensuring consistent quality across all 94 institutions, maintaining hostel discipline, and standardizing competitive exam coaching proved demanding. Retention of subject teachers was a concern.
• External Challenges
  • Periodic social resistance, especially concerning gender integration, weather events disrupting schooling in certain districts, and technology usage gaps among rural students emerged during implementation.
• Mitigation Efforts
  • Standard operating procedures were developed for administration. Guest teachers and online classes supplemented shortages. Helpdesks and alumni mentoring circles were introduced to support students emotionally and academically.

Outcomes

• Quantitative
  • The initiative now supports over 35,000 students. In competitive exams, 1230 students were trained for NEET and 570 for JEE in the 2023–24 session. Sports achievements include multiple medals at state and national levels in judo, athletics, and powerlifting.
• Qualitative
  • Students report improved academic confidence, better peer support, and exposure to global learning standards. There is a noticeable shift in parental attitudes toward education. Schools are emerging as model institutions in their districts.
• Monitoring and evaluation
  • Monitoring is conducted by the Social Welfare Department using dashboards and school-level reporting. Student feedback, academic results, and periodic inspections inform iterative improvements.

Replicability / Scalability / Sustainability

The model is highly replicable for other states seeking to uplift marginalized students through residential schooling. Its scalability is evidenced by uniform SOPs, digital infrastructure, and multi-stakeholder support. Sustainability is embedded in the convergence of academic, health, and welfare services.

• Policy Integration
  • The project aligns with state and national objectives under RTE, Samagra Shiksha, and Digital India. It is also tied into the Abhyudaya Yojana for exam coaching.
• Financial Sustainability
  • Funded through the Social Welfare Department’s budget, the model leverages CSR and NGO support to reduce dependency and add innovation layers.

Presentation

Video

Gallery

---